JULY 29, 2007

 

QUESTION - name 3 pieces of college football memorabilia you wish you owned. how/where would you display them?

 

 

S

 

1) bear bryant's houndstooth hat - this simple hat represents: the greatest coach to ever walk the sidelines, a pioneer and legend of the game, the golden era of college football, and the powerhouse program that was alabama football. 25 years after his death and the houndstooth hat is still symbolic of the man who ruled college football when college football was king.

 

while it would certainly be a big deal to own such a hat, i wouldn't make a big deal of it. i'd set it on a nondescript book shelf in my office and casually tell my friends when they visited.

 

2) gerald ford's leather helmet - michigan football is rich with tradition: michigan stadium, the 'go blue' banner, hail to the victors, etc. but the famed winged helmet is the true centerpiece. getting a michigan helmet today would be easy, even one worn in a game by a player. but getting an authentic, vintage leather michigan helmet would be unheard of. and one worn by an american president would be utterly impossible.

 

again, while it would certainly be a big deal to own such a hat, i wouldn't make a big deal of it. i'd set it on the shelf next to bear's hat.

 

3) alonzo stagg's playbook - stagg is known for many innovations, including the helmet and the forward pass in football, the batting cage in baseball, and 5-on-5 basketball. but he's best known as one of the pioneering minds in the history of college football. the evidence of that i'm sure could be found in his playbook. i imagine a old cracked wooden clipboard or a worn leather 3-rind binder containing page after page of pencil-drawn plays. circles and arrows and play numbers. flipping through the pages of that playbook would essentially be like watching college football evolve, one page at a time.

 

this would be my prize possession, i'd set it in the corner of my office on its own wooden stand. when my friends visited it would always be the last thing i'd show them.

 

honorable mention - notre dame 'play like champion today' sign, michigan 'go blue' banner, bench from original michigan stadium, ticket stub from ark/texas 1969 or bama/wash 1926, first heisman trophy, bear bryant's pratice tower, arkansas helmet from 1964 game vs texas, sign off bear's (or bo's) office door that read 'coach bryant'.

 

 

I

 

1. 1969 Michigan v. Ohio State Program.  Someday I'll own this gem.  The cover of Michigan's most historic win is a vintage shot with five famed UM coaches atanding together in the Big House.  Easily the most heralded program for Michigan football.

 

2.  A pair of Woody Hayes' glasses.  Woody's famed black-rimmed pointed glasses would be a signature item in anyone's basement.

 

3.  The football from Charles Woodson's punt return in 97' against Ohio State.  The favorite UM moment in my lifetime barely edging out Howard against OSU and/or Notre Dame.  Having a piece of this frantic yet utterly gratifying moment would be priceless. 

 

 

JULY 22, 2007

 

QUESTION - what two things (e.g., events, games, personnel, decisions, recruits, etc.) over the last 20 years have had the greatest impact on where your program stands today?

 

 

S

 

1) arkansas joins the sec, 1992 - this is far and away the most significant thing to happen to arkansas football since the 1964 national title. in the swc (prior to 1992), arkansas was a fixture in the top-20, was always in the conference title hunt, had natural/geographic rivals, was part of the premier conference rivalry game with texas (tamu folks might disagree, but it would have been a debate), and had a natural/fertile recruiting base in texas. in short, arkansas was one of the good teams in a solid league and received national attention (even the cover of si a couple times). classic tilts that affected the national title picture like hog/horns, 1969 and hogs/sooners, 1978 occurred semi-regularly. national match-ups and january football were annual affairs.

 

in the sec (since 1992) arkansas is a different team, is almost never a top-20 team, is rarely in the conference title hunt, has no rivals, no recruiting base, and (most disappointing) is one of the average teams in a great league and receives almost no national attention.

 

joining the sec wasn't all bad, the swc was crumbling and arkansas needed out. the sec is the best conference in cfb and receives lots of attention and money. but, now that the b12 has proven a viable league, it's probably a better fit for arkansas.

 

2) hiring/firing of gus malzahn, 2006 - if you want to know the state of the football program as it stands today, look no further than malzahn. nutt was coming off back-to-back losing seasons and was a dead coach walking. add that he was on the verge of losing 4 bluechip recruits from his own backyard (one the national gatorade player of the year). so nutt did what any sane sec head coach would do - he hired the bluechip prospects high school coach to be offensive coordinator. as crazy as it sounds, it was a brilliant decision. nutt saved his job, signed 3 of the kids (including the all-everything qb).

 

nutt reportedly gave control of the offense to malzahn, who immediately installed a modern passing game and a couple of gimic packages to maximize darren mcfadden's touches (the wildcat package being the most notable).

 

the hogs finished the season 10-4, mcfadden won the doak walker and finished 2nd in the heisman voting, the all-everything qb went 8-0 including a couple of last second wins, and malzahn was named oc of the year by rivals.com.

 

a perfect story, right? wrong.

 

malzahn was essentially demoted after the season to co-coordinator (without his knowledge) and decided to take the oc job at tulsa instead. fans revolted by bashing nutt, detailing his private phone records, taking the university and athletic department to court, and finding ways to butcher the program they loved - just to see nut fired.

 

meanwhile, nutt acted ignorant to the whole thing.

 

malzahn's hiring/firing were significant for 2 reasons:

 

a) malzahn had proven he could bring innovation (and players) to an offense that received national attention under his guidance. malzahn proved he could win on offense in the sec. and, malzahn restored hope and brought excitement.

 

in essence it's significant because hog fans found faith in the program.

 

b) malzahn was the anti-nutt. he wasn't full of cliches, he wasn't unorganized, he didn't have the 'used car salesman' aura, and he knew what he was doing. it turns out that many of the fans who despised nutt actually loved malzahn. so when malzahn was fired, the despise for nutt intensified to hatred and disgust. the result was some of those fans stopped caring altogether and the others took any action they could (legal, personal, financial, etc.)

 

in essence it's significant because hog fans lost faith in the program.

 

today the program stands divided, literally, with nutt in the center. malzahn saved nutt's job - and cost him his legacy.

 

honorable mention

 

1) darren mcfadden - a doak walker winner and heisman finalist is the stuff of razorback lore

 

2) ark/tenn, 1998 - hogs were 8-0, up 3, and taking a knee when a fumble caused a loss to the eventual national champs.

 

 

I

 

The two events that have most significantly shaped where Michigan football is today is a very difficult question to gauge.  There are numerous angles to approach this topic with literally over ten different realistic and appropriate answers.

 

1.  FSU 51 Michigan 31

 

The premier OOC game of the 91' schedule pitted two powerful, yet different in style, teams that had all the earmarks of a classic tilt at Michigan Stadium.  Most UM faithful at the time respected FSU, but also quietly remained confident entering this sexy match-up.  At this time the PAC 10 was just beginning to evolve into a passing league, the B10 remained a "three yards and a cloud of dust" conference and the now common term "southern speed" was still in its infancy.  That was about to change.

 

The game was overly nearly immediately.  FSU was more prepared, hyped, and painfully more athletic.  UM, and on a grander scale, the B10 was exposed this afternoon.  This blatant mismatch in athleticism forced Michigan to immediately re-evaluate their approach to recruiting and staffing their program.  While a methodical and slow approach could still work in-conference it was clear that if UM were to compete on a national level it would need to become more athletic immediately.  This was only reinforced later in the same year when another athletic team, Washington in the Rose Bowl, again revealed UM as a step slow in nearly ever facet of their team. 

 

In a way this game was a blessing in disguise because it taught UM quicker than most B10 teams the necessary adjustments needed in recruiting.  It opened their eyes sooner rather than later. Today UM is very athletic, places a key emphasis on speed in recruiting, and for the most part can compare with most national teams athletically.  The 91' FSU debacle was the beginning of this change.

 

2.  Tom Brady's NFL success:

 

Through the mid 80's to early 90's UM was assembling a respected pipeline of signal callers to the NFL.  Harbaugh, Collins, Griese, Grbac, and even Scott Driesbach either made NFL rosters or even achieved moderate NFL success.  It was beginning to be a great tool/selling point in recruiting the most important position on the field.  UM's pro-style offense and budding pedigree was becoming quite a draw for the nation's elite prep quarterbacks. 

 

Brady's unexpected and incredible NFL success did a couple of things.  It confirmed across the nation that UM did a great job preparing QB's for the NFL.

 

Secondly, it gave the pedigree an indelible face for UM to proudly draw upon.  While UM did endure a dry spell between Henne and Mallett they are a now a factor for several elite prep qb's.  In the last five years they've signed four Elite 11 Qb's (Gutz, Richard, Henne, Weinke) and have been considered for other big-timers (Leinart, Tebow, Mustain).  Being able to consistently land and develop quality QB's is a near must for a program to sustain excellence.  Brady's rise to the top of the NFL has done more than anyone else in cementing that image.

 

Honorable Mention:

 

DC Jim Hermann leaving for the NY Giants. (long overdue and showed LC could make a tough call)

 

Tennessee 45 Michigan 17 in 01' (revisiting the 91' dilemma albeit not as drastically)

 

QB Coach Scott Loeffler saying no to the Patriots. (QB guru is not replaceable)

 

Drew Henson leaving for the NY Yankees (stalled the program for the next two years)

 

Ohio State hiring Jim Tressell (why not Glen Mason?)

 

Michigan 35 OSU 21 in 03 (imagine a 6 game losing streak to OSU)

 

JULY 15, 2007

 

QUESTION - rank the top 5 mascots/nicknames in cfb. here's a recent attempt by si.com:

http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2007/sioncampus/06/20/mascot.rankings/index.html

 

 

S

 

1) alabama crimson tide - there tremendous bias here yes. but this is also a legit #1. the crimson tide, named after a td scored in the red mud of a rainy alabama afternoon. not a tiger or bulldog or wildcat or some other common animal voted on by a century-old student body. and the mascot is an elephant, the largest most powerful member of the animal kingdom. again, not picked by antique students, but named after a varsity squad so large it dwarfed opponents. this is the way nicknames and mascots should be born, of natural events - not contrived by the glee club.

 

2) navy midshipmen - navy always gets my respect and this is no exception. the rows of white hats, the classic uniforms, colors, and helmets. it's one of my favorite cfb programs. the name midshipmen is solid as a nickname, but passes all (but one) others because it is as true a nickname as can be found. these really are midshipmen. only navy sailors, navy humans, and navy college students would be more true. the goat is also a nice touch.

 

3) stanford cardinal - there's not much football tradition at stanford (sans john elway), so this pick is based solely on my own regard for the right combination of class, creativity, and absurdity. first, i like colors as team names - shades of red in particular. second, only wicked-smart college kids (who were also from, and lived in, california) could successfully execute having a tree for a mascot. not a tree with a cardinal in it, or a cardinal-red tree. no, just a plain green tree wandering around on the sidelines during home games.

 

4 and 5) cornell big red and dartmouth big green - again, i like color names. reality is that an ivy league football team is the equivalent of an sec debate team - out of place among their peers. regardless, neither cornell football nor dartmouth football deserves to be described as "big". furthermore, these 2 ivy programs are among the worst in league history. however, rather than take away from the nicknames these mere realities add to them. for the record, cornell has no official mascot and dartmouth is currently deciding between "keggy the keg" and the dartmoose for theirs.

 

 

 

 

 

I

 

5.  Georgia Bulldogs:  Generally I am not fond of overly common nicknames.  It seems like in every county across the nation you  can find a high school that uses Bulldogs to represent their athletics.  However, Georgia does the Bulldog proud.  UGA has appeared on the cover of SI and sports a spiked collar and Georgia sweater/jersey on the sidelines.  Bonus points for keeping the bloodlines in the family and burying the mascots near the stadium in almost ceremonial fashion.

 

4.  Navy Midshipmen:  Midshipmen is an appropriate and unique nickname.  However, Navy gets ever more "cred" from me with Bill the Goat.  How can you not embrace a matted and haggard looking animal we are accustomed to seeing grazing on grass in some quaint Swiss village.  They bust down that image, throw a blanket over his back, and charge out onto the field with this once tame animal sprinting full force to midfield.  It is classic and pure Navy.

 

3.  South Carolina Gamecocks:  Not that I think a rooster bred for fighting is a particularly cool mascot.  I am glad Michigan does not have it.  Yet, it fits South Carolina perfectly.  Only in a culturally-delayed, southern state would a Gamecock fly as their mascot.  Can you imagine this at Boston College or Stanford?  I am sure the "Cock" faithful totally dig this image.  Bonus points for the old white ballcap that read with bold scarlet letters "COCKS".  I owned one.

 

2.  Georgia Tech Ramblin' Wreck:  This is a personal favorite.  The pristine, vintage old car driving out on the field with GT emblems painted on its doors.  Plus, just the name "Rambin Wreck" sounds totally bad-ass even if your team is anything but bad-ass.  One of the few mascots to take a chance with an unconventional mascot and have it pan out.

 

1.  USC Trojans:  Everything about this makes sense.  It all fits so perfectly.  They play in the Coliseum which fits the Trojan well.  Then the fight song makes me feel like I am suddenly in ancient Rome about to fight a Lion in some ampitheater with 25,000 on-lookers watching my impending death.  However, just as it cannot get any more surreal out rolls Traveler the white stallion.  The horse is pure white and trotting along the sidelines with the fully armored Trojan mascot in a stadium called the Coliseum with a kick-ass fight song in the background.  Pure class.

 

 

JULY 8, 2007

 

QUESTION - what 1 former player (i.e., alumni) does the 2007 arkansas/michigan team need to compete for a national title?

 

 

S

 

chances are that no single player would make the 2007 version of the hogs an nc contender there are just too many needs, the most obvious being o-line, d-line, and quarterback.

 

it's tempting to pick a qb to return, like say clint stoerner. this team is in need of a gritty, steady, mistake-free leader who can make a few timely throws. casey dick is currently the only non-freshman scholarship qb on the hogs roster and he has not shown he can make timely throws. however, picking a qb would be a wasted pick on a team that has the best rb tandem in cfb with a coach who runs the ball 70% (+) of the time.

 

it's also tempting to pick a d-lineman. after all, pressuring the qb is the #1 solution to stopping an sec (or any other) offense. however, picking a d-lineman would be on a team that has speed at every position with a ultra-aggressive d-coordinator who sends pressure from anywhere and everywhere (including, but not limited to, the line).

 

so, the real (and remaining) need is at o-line. this might seem a bit surprising given that the hogs return 7 experienced lineman (but loses the starting left tackle) from a group that pushed opposing defenses around last year. however, and this cannot be overstated, the entire success of this team depends on:

 

a) opening running lanes for darren mcfadden and felix jones

b) protecting casey dick on those occasions he needs to complete a 3rd and 12

c) keeping the defense off the field by sustaining long offensive drives

 

so, give me the security of an experienced, nasty, pile-driving left tackle to open lanes, protect the qb, and sustain drives. and that security comes best in the 6'6', 350 lb frame of shawn andrews, former hog all-american.

 

 

I

 

My answer is boring, but also accurate.  Try to act interested.

 

A quick glance at the 2007 Michigan football team reveals their immediate and obvious strengths and weaknesses.  The offense sports AA candidates at every position. Lead by four year starters Chad Henne and Mike Hart the backfield is perhaps as good as it has ever been in my lifetime.  The receiving core is a blast from UM's past with two capable and at times electrifying options in Mario Manningham and Adrian Arrington.  The 0-line sports three returning starters and two 5 star recruits starting for the first time.  The point?  I am not sure Braylon Edwards, Rick Leach, or any UM legend on offense would be needed this year to keep the chains moving.

 

The defense is the polar opposite.  The holes and unknowns are everywhere you turn.  The safeties and d-ends could be described as adequate.  Perhaps even capable.  The d-tackles, linebackers, and corners are both a mystery and a legitimate concern.  However, of those neglected units nothing screams help clearer than our cornerbacks.  Morgan Trent, who was simply abused last year by OSU and USC, returns as our weakest version of a "lock-down CB" in my lifetime.  He's as good as we have.  Opposite him is Johnny Sears who logged the most snaps last year against Ball State and was torched in the process giving up two big plays.  UM did recruit a stud in Donovan Warren out of California (and also lost two instate blue-chippers at CB) and we'd like to think he is ready to go.  That wishful thinking is indicative of our present situation.

 

Therefore, the answer is obvious.  Charles Woodson.  Woodson would do all the obvious things.  He'd provide leadership for a unit desperately seeking someone to stand up and shine.  He'd totally close off the opposition's best WR and in the process make everyone's job on the defense easier.  He'd allow DC Ron English to take more chances and be more aggressive.  In short, he would solve several issues and make UM a legitimate NC contender.  Instead we are an offensive juggernaut ripe for the pickings because our defense simply does not appear as though it can hold up consistently.

 

JULY 1, 2007

 

QUESTION - 2007 has been a big year for major league baseball statistics. bonds, slammin sammy, biggio, the big hurt, clemons, glavine, and so on are all crossing or pursuing hall-of-fame numbers (e.g., 300 wins, 500 hrs, 3000 hits). not to be outdone, cfb has its own share of hall-of-fame numbers; list and discuss the 3 most meaningful.

 

 

S

 

unlike professional sports, elite-ness in college sports is measured at the level of the coach and the program. while individual numbers like 2 heisman's (e.g., archie griffin) and 2600 yards (e.g., barry sanders) are impressive, they are secondary to national titles and 10-win seasons. here are some program- or coach-level milestone numbers.

 

back-to-back ncs

 

national titles are often elusive. great teams (e.g., alabama in 1966), undefeated teams (e.g., penn st 1994 and auburn 2004), and even great coaches (e.g., bo schembechler) have been deserving, yet denied. so in some ways having 1 national title is itself signifies a program's rise to elite status. however, programs like byu, colorado, washington, arkansas, and michigan st have 1 national title - and these are not elite programs. more elusive, downright rare, are back-to-back titles. these signify the truly elite - those programs that have left their mark on history. here are the teams that can claim back-to-back titles over the last 50 year:

 

USC (2003-04)

Nebraska (1994-95; 1970-71)

Alabama (1978-79; 1964-65)

Oklahoma (1974-75; 1955-56)

 

100 wins in a decade

 

though this is becoming more common, it still signals a program that had prolonged dominance of conference and national headlines for 10 years. here are the bcs teams to do it:

 

alabama (70's, 103-16-1)

oklahoma (70's, 102-13-3)

nebraska (80's, 103-20-0)

florida st (90's, 109-13-1)

nebraska (90's, 108-16-1)

florida (90's, 102-22-1)

 

300 coaching wins

 

300 wins is the benchmark for most elite of elite coaches. of course, there's some luck, health, and tolerance involved. these coaches coached for 30, 40, even 50 years. survived down years and won their share of close games. there's also some great and innovative coaching needed to average nearly 10 wins a season. for  here's a list of some of the 300 winners:

 

alonzo stagg

bear bryant

pop warner

joe paterno

bobby bowden

 

 

I

 

2,628

 

The immortal Barry Sanders holds the record for most rushing yards in a single season.  This number, seemingly untouchable and held by a legend, will generate the most attention if ever challenged or ultimately broken.  However, similar to Roger Maris' 61 HRs, this record in a way will stand forever even if broken.  Sanders racked up nearly 240 yards a game and almost 40 TD's in an 11 game slate with little surrounding support.

 

Regardless if this record is eclipsed, it will always be used as the benchmark for great CFB running backs.

 

48

 

I've always felt that Joe Dimaggio's 56 game hitting streak would generate the most attention if ever broken.  Snapping Oklahoma's 48 game winning streak would be in the same category.  Imagine the countdown, talk of dynasty, analysis of remaining schedule, etc.  If any team comes with 10 games of this record it will generate huge attention.  However, given the addition of conference title games and the increased parity in CFB this streak seems safe.

 

1

 

Charles Woodson remains the lone Heisman Trophy winner who was primarily a defensive player.  While this may seem like a homer pick it may not be duplicated in our lifetime.  In the last 15 years the best another defensive player has finished was 4th.  Even if you disagree with how this award is determined it remains a huge storyline throughout the CFB season and the voters are increasingly shifting towards high profile offensive players with big stats.  Matching Woodson's historic achievement in 1997 will prove very difficult and potentially impossible in today's CFB landscape.

 

JUNE 24, 2007

 

QUESTION - The following teams are ranked, in order by seed, as the 16 best CFB programs from 1975-99.  It is a who's who list of CFB programs.  Most all of them dripping with success and tradition.  Play this 16 team tournament out, with score and short description of each game, and determine a winner.

 

All games would be played right now on a neutral grass field.  You are not held to these picks come time for The Challenge. 

 

1.  Nebraska

16. Colorado

5.  Michigan

12. Florida

3.  Alabama

14. Georgia

7.  Penn State

10. Ohio State

8.  Oklahoma

9.  USC

4.  Florida State

13. Tennessee

6.  Notre Dame

11. Washington

2.  Miami

15. UCLA

 

 

S

 

ROUND 1

 

#1 nebraska 31 / #16 colorado 9 - a bizarre (and nearly unwatchable) game in which 2 average teams combine for 100 pass attempts.

 

#8 ou 17 / #9 usc 41 - absent a qb, the sooner offense is stifled from the start. usc explodes for 28 2nd half points. is usc the favorite to win this?

 

#5 michigan 23 / #12 florida 16 - the wolves maturity, balanced offense, and mistake free defense bests the youthful and talented gators. does michigan have the right combination to go all the way?

 

#4 fsu 14 / #13 tennessee 16 (2 ot) -  the vols dominate both lines of scrimmage and hold the noles to 0 offense points.

 

#3 alabama 10 / #14 georgia 21 - the alabama defense is on the field all game and finally breaks early in the 4th quarter.

 

#6 notre dame 41 / #11 washington 27 - the irish offense steals the headlines but the defense surrenders 24 points to a bad washington team. is this a sign of things to come?

 

#7 penn st 7 / #10 ohio st 13 - the better defense wins. can the buckeye offense score enough?

 

#2 miami 14 / #15 ucla 19 - in an upset, the bruins offense is able to move the ball while the canes offense is dormant.

 

ROUND 2

 

#1 nebraska 17 / #9 usc 28 - too much trojan talent, but the offense struggles. is usc vulnerable?

 

#5 michigan 24 / #13 tennessee 23 - power running and constant qb pressure keep the vols in control until a late interception by ainge. did the vols uncover the formula to beating michigan?

 

#14 georgia 38 / #6 notre dame 14 - georgia has too much size and speed and dominates from start to finish.

 

#10 ohio st 20 / # 15 ucla 7 - the ucla offense manages only 80 total yards.

 

ROUND 3

 

#9 usc 24 / #5 michigan 10 - usc shuts down the um offense and manages a couple big plays.

 

#14 georgia 9 / #10 ohio st 6 - osu misses smith, ginn and gonzalez.

 

CHAMPIONSHIP

 

#9 usc 33 / #14 georgia 17 - usc harasses (and abuses) the young uga qb and does what it wants in the 2nd half.

 

 

I

 

Round One:

 

Nebraska 45  CU 10:  Huskers' dominate as Keller throws 4 TD's.  Husker nation whispers about a potential NC and Keller invite to NYC.  Fans are giddy.

 

USC 16 OU 7:  Boring game concludes with OU unable to score on late and rare drive.  Media begins to question USC's true dominance.

 

Michigan 27  UF 24Michigan dominates 1H and hangs on for dear life in 2H.  UM fans take the win, but are pissed it got so close.

 

FSU 19  Tennessee 7:  They're back!  Noles' D dominates all day and Bowden is lauded for overhauling staff. 

 

Bama 14  UGA 13:  Bama hangs around all day and capitalizes when Richt gambles on a 3rd and 9 pass late in the game that leads to an INT and great Bama field position.  Dawg fans leave discouraged with play of Stafford.

 

Notre Dame 21  Washington 10:  Snooz-o-rama.  Weis plays three QB's as Irish look underwhelming in methodical win over Willingham.  ND fans rationalize game by touting Clausen's three completions for 18 yards. 

 

Penn State 22 Ohio State 16:  Joe Pa comes out swinging as Morelli throws ball 42 times.  Derrick Williams chews up OSU's all-everything CB Malcolm Jenkins to the tune of 150 yards receiving. 

 

Miami 39  UCLA 14:  In a coming out party for Randy Shannon the Canes resemble the teams of yester-year.  Think "Tennesse-Cal in 06'" and that is what this game was like. 

 

Round Two

 

USC 30  Nebraska 0:  Husker fans lose giddiness and optimism as they long for the days of Crouch and Solich after this debacle.  Callahan comes out firing and it backfires.  SC picks off Keller three times in the 1Q and Nebraska never threatens.  

 

Florida State 29  Michigan 17:  Numerous breakdowns in the secondary and a conservative offensive approach throw UM fans into a complete meltdown.  Record number of hits on firelloydcarr.com the next morning. 

 

Notre Dame 19  Alabama 17:  A heart-breaking loss for the Tide.  Paker-Wilson fumbles late snap as Tide are attempting to run out the clock late spoiling an otherwise flawless afternoon for the signal caller.  ND slides in a 49 yard FG as time expires. Scofield goes into hiding for a month.

 

Miami 20  Penn State 19Miami blocks two punts and sacks Morelli eight times.  Late overturn by replay official wipes out a 52 yard reception by Deon Butler and sends Miami to the final

four.

 

 

Round Three

 

Florida State 29  USC 27:  A bittersweet day for JD Booty.  Throws for three TD's and over 300 yards, but in the face of constant FSU pressure fumbles twice and throws two INT's.  USC mishandles late FG attempt and the national media proclaims FSU is officially back.  One of the better games in recent memory.

 

Miami 9 Notre Dame 7:  A rematch of the classic Catholics v. Convicts does not disappoint.  A brawl in the tunnel leading up to the game sends Weis to the hospital with a broken femur and multiple cleat marks on his arms.  Drama continues on the field as Miami injuries 2 ND QB's forcing Clausen to lead the ship in 2H.  He looks scared and fails miserably as ND never crosses midfield.

 

Title Game

 

Florida State 15  Miami 14:  In an odd twist of fate, not only does FSU nail five FG's against their arch-rival, but they block Miami's 29 yard chip shot at the gun.  Afterward Bowden tires of the rumors that Fisher and Amato and jostling to be his replacement and fires both of them.  Hires his nephew to be new OC brings back his son to be associate head coach. 

 

JUNE 17, 2007

 

QUESTION - write a want-ad for the next head coach at michigan/arkansas as if it were going to appear in a newspaper. be sure to specify anything (and everything) you expect in the 'successful applicant'.

 

 

S

 

wanted: head football coach; university of arkansas razorbacks

 

the successful applicant will: be a lifelong hog fan; call the hogs proudly (and with zeal); be 50% redneck and 50% old southern charm; use backwoods cliches like "madder than a hornet" and "slower than an opossum"; put a recruiting "fence" around the state; find a gritty winner for a qb in the mold of clint stoerner; find mammoth o-lineman from small arkansas towns; find speed anywhere (but not from the north); dislike the entire state of texas (except dallas) but go there frequently to steal recruits; get recruits from oklahoma and louisiana as well; never get recruits from kansas or missouri and call them "basketball" states; believe you can win the sec but badmouth the team every chance you get (ala lou holtz); go to church every sunday but also curse freely (never use the f-word); occasionally break ncaa rules (not because you cheat but because you make your own rules and you don't let anyone tell you what to do); sometimes grunt and growl to players instead of talking; tolerate but dislike and distrust the media; smile rarely (and never on camera and don't show teeth); have a hot wife that's 67% classy and 33% trashy; chew tobacco; spit frequently; lose a game you shouldn't; win a game you shouldn't; play a creampuff non-conference schedule and beat them mercilessly; play texas and lose a close game; win in october; call all your teams and players "special"; make sure 2-4 players a year get stopped for routine traffic violations and are later found with: a) guns, b) drugs, or c) both; remember, the lower the gpa the better the athlete; openly believe that junior colleges are modern-day gold mines; blame bad decisions on everyone else; take credit for bad decisions with good outcomes; never make good decisions; finish 4-4 in conference no matter how good or bad the team is; every 5 years you should: a) go to a jan bowl, b) 3 dec bowls, and c) miss a bowl; run the ball 70% of the time no matter what (but tell fans you like to throw the ball and brag about the qb's arm strength); occasionally run off a player who will later be an nfl draft choice; ignore frequent special teams mishaps and never, ever blame the special teams coach; never fire asst coaches (just give them different titles); have agent immediately float your name out for every new opening at a high profile job and then deny interest and act surprised when your name is mentioned; repeatedly say that arkansas is a "special place" and that you "love the helmet".

 

 

I

 

Michigan's next head football coach must embody the following characteristics:

 

1.  Sacrifice:  Your salary will pale in comparison to other high profile jobs.  Get used to it. Using phrases like "the pride of this great university" and "being a Michigan Man" would be in your best interest.

 

2.  Discipline:  New coach must train players "the right way."  An occasional high five between teammates is acceptable.  However, trash-talk, running up the score, and showing any unnecessary emotion by players is strictly prohibited.  Think "robot" and you'll be fine.

 

3.  Loyalty:  Must keep assistant coaches a minimum of 10 years regardless of their performance.  If the assistant has Michigan ties then you must keep them 15 years.  If your "best friend" runs a neighboring MAC school into the ground you must hire him back immediately.

 

4.  Old-school:  Must chastise anything progressive or new about CFB.  Night games are bad.  Period.  In fact, anything outside of a noon Saturday game should be viewed skeptically.  Furthermore, the UM-ND rivalry is great drama.  Playing a different OOC team, like Miami or Oklahoma, is prohibited.

 

5.  Conservative:  The minute you take the lead in a football game you must either run the ball or throw predictable screen passes.  The shot-gun and streak patterns are theories not taught at Michigan.

 

6.  Narrow-mindedness:  Qb's are to be tall and white.  Never, under any circumstance, should you use a minority QB who is athletic and possesses the ability to make plays outside the pocket.

 

7.  Goal-oriented:  Your goal is simple:  Win the Big Ten.  B10 titles are all that matter.  Repeat this every year when some other team is playing in the NC game.  Never mention the term "national championship" before December. 

 

8.  Pedigree:  Do you have Michigan ties?  I don't care how innovative, savvy, and hard-working you are.  If you are not from Michigan don't apply.  We'd rather take someone inexperienced (Ron English), incompetent (Mike DeBord), or unworthy (Jim Harbaugh) than a coach with a high upside and impressive track record.

 

 

JUNE 10, 2007

 

QUESTION - What is the worst blown call an official has ever made in college football? 

 

 

S

 

a few bad calls immediately come to mind: a) the 5th down during the mizzou/colo game in 1990 eventually allowing colo to win a share of the national title, b) the kick-tip between mizzou/neb in 1997 eventually allowing colo to win a share of the national title, c) the pass phantom pass interference in the 2002 miami/ohio st bcs title game, d) a couple of terrible calls in michigan/msu games (e.g., desmond trip, extra second), e) the onside kick recovery in the early season oregon/oklahoma game in 2006, and so on.

 

but, while these were certainly terrible calls, they don't really stir my blood years later. to me they're simply ho-hum, 'bad calls.

 

in fact, the call that lingers with me isn't even really a blown infraction as it was a missed chance to do the right thing.

 

it was 2005, alabama vs southern miss. bama was in the 2nd year of the mike shula era and coming off a woeful 4-9 2004 season that was leagues below expectations. the prognosis for 2005 was better, but shula was the wild card and in the season opener the tide had looked sluggish and unimpressive in a 26-7 victory over middle tennessee state. the next week looked even worse as southern miss took a 21-10 lead over the tide and bryant-denny in the middle of the 3rd quarter. the offense, as usual under shula, had been likeless. the outlook for the entire. season was bleak. that all changed in 10 seconds.

 

all-purpose wideout tyrone prothro ran a streak down the center of the field right through the heart of the so miss secondary and strong-armed qb brodie croyle lofted a beautiful spiralling ball down toward the endzone. what happened next would be remembered as one of the greatest catches ever made.

 

along with prothro, 2 so miss defenders strode step for step as the ball descended near the goalline. prothro's concentration never wavered, even as the ball sailed long and 1 of the defenders stood between prothro and the ball. unaffected, prothro simply leapt, put his arms around the defender, and caught the ball against the defender's back.

 

an apparent touchdown and pandimonium in bryant-denny . . . except that the refs placed the ball on the 1-yard-line. replay would indicate that, while it was a tough call, prothro actually rolled over the defender (nearly breaking his neck) and the momentum of the catch carried him into the endzone before his knees touched turf. the call was not overturned.

 

it should have been. the crowd would have exploded and bama would have stormed back onto the national scene. instead (and unsurprisingly) the bama offense took 3 additional plays to limp across the goalline and the crowd was understandably luke-warm about the eventual touchdown.

 

the catch received national exposure and won prothor an espy. it was the greatest 52-yard, non-td catch in alabama history.

 

 

I

 

Worst call of my lifetime ...

 

I spent probably three hours searching the internet for a picture to justify this pick.  Yet, was unable to locate one.  It would have helped. 

 

1990:  Michigan V. Michigan State

 

The #1 ranked Wolverines hosted MSU in the Big House.  As many UM-MSU games would later show this was the beginning of several high-scoring, back-and-forth affairs between the in-state rivals.  MSU took the lead with a late TD and UM promptly answered with a short dart to Derrick Alexander to pull within one with under a minute to go.  At this time overtime was a mere thought and Gary Moeller made the only decision he had; he went for the win.

 

The electrifying Desmond Howard lined up in the slot to left of Elvis Grbac in what seemed like man-to-man coverage.  A dream scenario for the ultra-quick future Heisman Trophy winner.  With a quick juke and stutter-step Howard left DB Eddie Brown immediately reeling as Howard ran a quick slant in the upper left hash.  Knowing he was beat, Brown grabbed onto Howard's ankle/foot in a desperate move to avoid the conversion.  Howard immediately lost his balance, but hung onto the football only until he crashed into the endzone where the ball squirted free. 

 

The refs called nothing.  The pass interference was obvious, yet not called.  Even worse, replays would reveal the ground caused the ball to jar free and that the catch itself was good.  Refs called incomplete.  Game over.

 

That was MSU's last win in Ann Arbor and a blatantly unjust win at that.  Several years later MSU, this time in their stadium, would steal another win.  This time by corrupt clock management.  However, this call will always stick with me.  In 1990 Howard became my first true CFB love.  I idolized the little guy and to this day he remains my all-time favorite Wolverine. 

 

Mere minutes after the game our school librarian, and MSU alumnus, called the house to "discuss" the aftermath.  I answered the phone, listened to about three sentences, and hung up on him without uttering a word.  I'll never forget the look on my dad's face.  He was part upset that I was so rude and part, "Atta boy."  He asked who it was, I told him, and we went about our day. 

 

JUNE 3, 2007

 

QUESTION - florida basketball coach billy donovan recently reneged on accepting an nba head coaching job - essentially asking for a do-over. lucky for donovan, he did so before ruining his career. name 2 college football coaches who weren't so lucky - that would give anything for a do-over.

 

 

S

 

john l smith, from louisville to msu - smith had proven a solid coach at idaho and had success at louisville, including an 11 win season. his offenses were known to be explosive. smith would have eventually had plenty of offers and he made a mistake by taking the msu job. two things really hurt. one was the state of msu football at the time. bobby williams had just completed one of the great hatchet jobs in recent memory turning a top-10 team into a 2-9 team. the other was timing. louisville football soared in the years after smith with top-10 rankings, 10-win seasons, and bcs status in the big east. when smith left louisville for msu, louisville got better and msu got worse - never a good combination.

 

mike price, wash state to alabama - this is almost too easy because no one can possibly want a do-over more than price. price was set for life in pullman, wa. he had the respect of his peers, a good marriage, all the money he could ever spend, job security, an above average program in a below average conference. he conducted an offense that fans and players loved and occasionally managed to land a high profile qb recruit. in his mid-50's he could have drifted off into wazzou lore. instead, he decided to take the alabama job - a decision that quickly crippled his career. the program was in chaos, facing the death penalty, and (as always) had all eyes watching. so price promptly goes to the gulf coast and picks up a stripper with a university credit card. he never coached a play and was never paid a dime by alabama.

 

to make matters worse, u of washington in seattle was hit by scandal and bottomed out in the years after price left pullman. oh, what might have been.

 

 

I

 

Glen Mason:  In 1995 Glen Mason, then the coach of Kansas, accepted then backed out of the University of Georgia football job.  Mason was building a quiet and yet consistent program in Lawrence and it only seemed like a matter of time before he landed a premier job.  If it was not UGA then it would definitely be some other desirable position.  He later left Kansas for MinnesotaHardly the dream job we thought was coming.   Then after fielding another consistent outfit in the Twin Cities, Mason begged for and ultimately was rejected for the OSU post.  This past season after blowing a bowl lead of historic proportions, Mason was fired.  Mason was always the guy the was bound for something bigger.  Yet, it never materialized.  I have to think he regrets passing on the UGA gig and never taking a premier gig somewhere along the way.  I wonder who is agent was and what Mason will do next.  My guess is it will be nothing close to the degree of Athens.

 

Gary Barnett:  Most "do-overs" involve a missed opportunity or premature decision.  Some, in the case of Barnett, Price, and Gary Moeller, result in complete humiliation of their family and university while concluding in a dramatic (sometimes overnight) loss of status, income, and hope.  Some are severe mistakes and Barnett's mishandling of the female kicker situation was epic.  In the mid 90's Barnett was hailed as a mastermind and among the best in his profession.  After CU fired him after some politically incorrect statements (which I still think were overblown) and a rape scandal Barnett was out of a job with little hope of ever reclaiming his once sterling reputation.   

 

 

MAY 27, 2007

 

QUESTION - Name three college basketball coaches, past or present, who would have made successful CFB coaches.  Also, provide the CFB program in which they would have been the best fit. 

 

 

S

 

tom izzo, michigan state - spartan football desperately needs tom izzo. izzo's every strength fits perfectly with sparty's every weakness. he's a tough disciplinarian that can recruit and develop players. his teams are physical and fundamentally sound, and play well in big games. this is such a natural match it could actually happen some day.

 

tim floyd, lsu - this may be the perfect pairing. floyd needs a fan base who cares and blue-chip talent. hardened by years of thankless nba fans and owners, floyd is all business when it comes his teams. lsu needs an even-tempered coach who can deal with fan hysteria while getting the most out of a rich recruiting area. also, floyd is a mississippi native who graduated from la-tech (and coached in new orleans twice) - so he knows the south.

 

roy williams, penn state - think jim tressel in blue. if tressel is the 'senator' then williams would be the 'congressman' - with his studious glasses, diminutive stature, and steady voice. williams guiding a mammoth, tradition-rich football program in a talent-packed state would quite possibly psychologically cripple one-half the coaches in the midwest and on the east coast. he'd ignore the pressure, embrace the expectations, and invite joe-pa to practice.

 

 

I

 

Gene Keady:  Army.  Keady screams either football or wrestling.  The lame attempt at a come-over.  The menacing eyes and steely demeanor.  Constantly yelling as though he were leading a pack of juveniles picking up highway trash.  The man was a true hard ass both in style and appearance.  Not a better or more appropriate fit than at West Point.

 

Bob Huggins:  Miami.  Just picture this for a second.  Could you imagine this scene?  For starters, Huggins will fit the 'Cane mold effortlessly.  Corrupt, arrogant, undisciplined, and always in need of attention.  Secondly, he would recruit the shit out of FLA and the 'Canes would be loaded with corrupt, arrogant, and undisciplined prepsters and JUCO's who never went to class.  He would have fit nicely as a replacement for Dennis Erickson. 

 

Billy Donovan:  Notre Dame.  Whoever coaches ND is always hated regardless of who they are.  Willingham an Davie were plain-jane types who ran a clean ship and showed class.  And we still hated them.  Imagine if they hired some little spunky kid with loads of confidence and an irritating rub to him.  Then imagine if he won back to back titles.  We'd go nuts.  That is all we'd talk about; our hate for Billy Donovan.  A guy like Donovan would take the hate for ND and raise it to heights unseen in our lifetime.

 

MAY 20, 2007

 

QUESTION - a company has been producing college football cards (like baseball cards) for 125 years. they have produced a card for every d-1 player and coach during that time. what are the 4 most valuable/popular cards this company has ever produced? 

 

 

S

 

john heisman rookie player, 1887 - all of heisman's cards are extremely rare, but the 1887 card was the first and most rare - making it the most valuable. in 1887, cfb cards had only been printed for 5 years and hadn't yet become popular collector's items. and at the time, heisman himself wasn't even a popular player at brown. but his transfer to penn, in his home state, and his coaching success that followed drove the value of the card up. but, it wasn't until the heisman trophy was established that the original heisman card exploded onto the collector's scene. not coincidentally, the 1887 card featured heisman the player in the identical pose of the trophy eventually named for him. the heisman 1887 is considered the 2nd most valuable card in existence, behind the stagg 1889 and only a few 100 are in circulation.

 

woody hayes rookie coach, 1949 - a little known coach in his first year at miami, ohio. very few people were saving redhawks cards those days, especially of a 1st year coach. the card grew in value as after hayes won national titles at ohio st. however, what ultimately made this one of the most coveted cards in history was that the picture on the 1949 card was of hayes teaching blocking techniques to a young, then unknown,  offensive lineman named bo schembechler. schembechler eventually took the head job at michigan and for most of their careers the onetime teammates were fierce rivals. like the 1949 bryant card, there are thought to be fewer than 1000 of these cards in circulation.

 

oj simpson, 1967 - the 'instant impact' cards were reserved for transfers (juco, small school, etc.), most of whom played a limited role in their 2-3 years on campus. one exception was oj simpson who led the nation in rushing and won the heisman in his 2 years at usc. the simpson rookie card was a high-value card through his college career and increased during his pro career. the card took off however when simpson stood trial for, and was eventually acquitted of, murder charges. it was easily the most high profile legal case involving an athlete and simpson once again displayed unmatched escapability. beating ucla is 1 thing, but beating a murder charge when blood is found in your escape vehicle - well that's just legendary.

 

smu signing class card, 1987 - the signing class card has always been one of the most popular. after national signing day on february 1, signees are invited to their new campuses to be photographed as a group. this was true for the 1987 signing class at smu. on february 1 they made there way to dallas for the group picture. however, on february 25 the ncaa gave smu the "death penalty", disallowing the upcoming 1987 season and allowing any smu players to transfer immediately. the 1987 signing class card was never mass-produced and never officially released. however, the smu athletic dept received 100 copies of the card in mid-february for initial inspection/approval, just days before the ncaa verdict. of those first 100, only a few dozen are in circulation making it one of the rarest cards ever made.

 

 

I

 

1.  1889 Amos Alonzo Stagg:  End for Yale.  The Honus Wagner of CFB cards.  This card, grainy and diminutive in appearance, was circulated as part of the famed 20 card 1889 set.  It's value soars over his other archaic peers (Rockne, Camp, etc) because ole' card #12 of the set (Stagg) was the first card featuring a player in action.  Stagg's over the shoulder catch pictured on the card set the bar for future action photos.

 

2.  1945 Paul Bryant:  Maryland Coach.  This card lived in obscurity for nearly a decade.  Passed off as nothing more than a boring coach card it was widely disregarded, and ultimately not saved, for years.  The sweaty Bryant in a tattered gray Maryland sweatshirt today can fetch a small fortune.  It is widely believed the only about a 1,000 still exist today and nearly 950 of them reside in Alabama.  Legend has it a pig farmer outside of Birmingham has three "mint", two "near mint, and one "excellent" stashed away in a mayonnaise jar buried in his backyard. 

 

3.  1980 Hershel Walker Rated Rookie:  RB for UGA.  The debut of the Rated Rookie feature hit the ground running as Walker burst on to the scene in 1980.  This color photo of Walker with a wood grain border was an instant success and started the craze for rookie cards.  The 459 card 1980 set was an otherwise bust.  Walker's lone card makes up 98% of the value of the whole set.

 

4.  1998 Chris Simms Error Card:  QB for Texas.  After committing to Tennessee the company was in a hurry to manufacture and distribute their latest supplemental set of "Hot Rookies."  Taking Simms word he would be a Vol he was included in the set sporting an orange Tennessee hat.  After he de-committed to Texas the company had already released 250 cards of Simms wearing TN orange to the public.  Easily the most coveted and valuable modern CFB card of the last 25 years.

 

MAY 13, 2007

 

QUESTION - Tell me one CFB storyline, player, coach, or program you are simply tired of hearing about.  In short, a topic you know will be reported in an endless manner by the media this upcoming season that will eventually make you sick. 

 

 

S

 

i'm tired of hearing that the football landscape has changed so dramatically over the past 40 years - it hasn't.

 

pundits say that it's impossible to have a dynasty in modern cfb, yet miami had a 30+ game winning streak across 3 seasons in the early 00's. and, in 2005 usc played for a 3rd consecutive national title. and florida state owned the 90's - winning 2 national titles, 8 straight acc titles, and 11 out of 13.

 

experts say that an sec team will never have a decade like alabama had in the 70's. yet, florida won 6 sec titles in the 90's. auburn is 33 - 5 over the past 3 seasons and lsu is 22 - 4.

 

talking heads say that the bcs conferences have parody. yet, michigan and ohio st still dominate the b10, usc still owns the p10, ou still leads the b12 (with texas and nebraska in the mix), the sec is still the best conference in cfb, and notre dame is still overrated.

 

sometimes the programs change, penn state has a down year or west virginia wins 11 games, but at its core college football has not changed.

 

ps - not since florida in 1996 has a program won its first national title.

 

 

I

 

The topic I am sick of has gained traction and momentum the last couple of years.  It is the newfound belief that we should not have preseason polls.  Lately some annually underachieving or irrelevant team gets off to a great start, yet is always ranked towards the bottom of the other unbeatens and even a couple one loss teams.  Immediately, often by mid-October, the media is begging for you to respect them and will undoubtedly utter, "Where would they be ranked if we did not have preseason polls?" 

 

This approach generally does not apply to mid-majors as we know their script, but teams like Clemson who can catch an early hot streak yet always stumble and generally in grand fashion.  If you want respect in the early polls then earn it.  Give the voters something to be optimistic about entering the season.  If you are generally a 7-5 program then you'll be viewed as a 7-5 program until otherwise noted.  Teams like Louisville and Cal have struggled mightily to gain national respect.  The Cardinals are just now getting that respect and Cal is showing us why they've never been given that respect. 

 

Preseason polls are obviously not going away.  They will continue to be a huge player in the ending BCS bids.  Take care of business on the field and everything "generally" will work itself out.  Until then quit bitching about a ranking your school has not seen in forever and focus on the remaining six games on your schedule. 

  

MAY 6, 2007

 

QUESTION - forecast the top 3 selections in the 2008 draft.

 

 

S

 

1) darren mcfadden, arkansas – great size, explosive speed. dmac, or mc-heisman, will enter his junior year as the best offensive player in cfb and part of an offense that will give him the ball on every play. he runs with toughness and elusiveness, has good hands, and runs well behind average talent against good defenses. there will be some chatter about his durability, but his workouts and 40 times will silence those.

 

2) brian brohm, louisville - good size, great arm strength. brohm would likely have been a top 15 pick this year (and probably would have gone ahead of quinn). he's flourished in a pro system and played well against his toughest competition. normally scouts would be skeptical of a qb from a weak conference like the big east, but brohm was considered the #1 qb coming out of high school and could have gone anywhere. that he played for a future nfl coach will only inflate his stock.

 

3) jake long, michigan - great size, good footwork. another junior who could have been a top 15 pick, long follows in a long line of productive michigan lineman. he's a fundamentally sound, versatile run/pass blocker who plays a need position for most teams at the top of the draft order.

 

 

 

I

 

In no specific order....

 

1.  Darren McFadden:  Likely the most popular, at this time, selection for #1 overall.  McFadden has blistered 8 man fronts in a tough CFB conference.  He is not a "system back" and his accomplishments are more impressive given his lack of surrounding talent.  He should blow up the combine and be the most highly sought after offensive player in CFB.

 

2.  Jake Long:  Likely would have been a top 10-15 pick had he entered this year.  Plays a coveted position, Left tackle, and would offer a nice safe pick for a team near the top of the draft.

 

3.  Derrick Harvey:  A fast, mean, and physical speed rusher off the edge.  Should remind scouts of past Gator DE Javon Kearse.  Created constant havoc in the BCS title game and will be amongst an impressive litter of SEC defensive linemen in next year's draft.

 

APRIL 29, 2007

 

QUESTION - many of the players selected in the 2007 nfl draft were not well-known, even to the most devoted college football fans; forget those guys. of those that were well-known, list 1 draft boom and 1 draft bust from day 1 (i.e., rounds 1-3) and 1 draft boom and 1 draft bust from day 2 (i.e., rounds 4-7).

 

 

S

 

of course the situation matters, but there are players every year who emerge as surprise rookie superstars. likewise there are players who are surprisingly silent. here are my picks for those guys:

 

day 1 boom = patrick willis. willis is a monster tackler with good speed and great size. he's a football guy, a lunch-pail guy, a guy who will immediately be the heart of the san fran defense. here's a bold prediction: willis will lead all rookie in tackles and be the runaway defensive rookie of the year.

 

day 1 bust = gaines adams. adams is the classic workout guy. average productivity in college paired with outstanding speed, strength, and agility make nfl gm's think he hasn't yet reached his full potential; it makes me think he never will. adams has the clemson factor working against him (who was the last tiger to do well at anything) and he's small. he's a poor man's mario williams, which essentially qualifies him for gov't assistance.

 

day 2 boom = michael bush. bush will be what ron dayne never was: a big, agile back with vision and burst. he's has played in a pro system (with a pro-level qb), caught balls out of the backfield, rushed well against pro-level defenses (miami), and would have been 1st round talent had the injury not dropped his stock. bush will rush for 500-600 yards in 2007 while sharing carries and be the fulltime guy by '08.

 

(i also like hb blades out of pitt)

 

day 2 bust = antonio pittman. of course there are lots of potential busts from rounds 4-7, but few were traded for specifically. new orleans actually traded up to get pittman. the situation is not good, remember deuce mcallister and reggie bush already occupy the saints backfield. and pittman is not an nfl back. he's small (under 6 foot, under 200 lbs), doesn't have explosive speed, doesn't have great power, and doesn't have stand-out elusiveness. he's your typical college athlete with no specific nfl skill set.

 

 

 

 

I

 

I'd like to make a personal disclaimer prior to making these selections.  For me, forecasting someone's NFL career has much more do with their opportunity and surroundings rather than their talent.  For example, in my lifetime I consider Jerry Rice the best player I've ever seen.  However, had the Tampa Bay Buccaneers drafted Rice I am not sure he'd even be a HOF'er let alone the best WR ever.  Therefore,......

 

Round 1-3 BOOM

 

Brandon Merriweather:  Very talented, in a healthy and productive environment, and he plays a position that translates well from CFB to the NFL.  Merriweather, considered a character issue entering the draft, will become a law-abiding citizen and smack-down safety by the end of his rookie year.  In three years he'll be mentioned with Roy Williams, Troy Polamalu, and Ed Reed as a premier safety in the NFL.

 

ROUND 1-3 BUST

 

Calvin Johnson:  This is so obvious I am amazed the loyal Lions cannot see this coming.  Yes, the kid is talented.  Some even call him the "best prosect the last 10 years."  However, consider that he is entering a franchise with an aging QB who is pinning their hopes on Drew Stanton as the heir apparent.  An offensive line that cannot pass-block or run-block.  A mediocre and very average running game whose "star" RB might not play this season.  And a franchise that is so steeped in losing that it can ruin the career of anyone, let alone the best prospect in 10 years.  By the time CJ escapes Detroit he'll be so bitter, jadded, and negative he'll have lost the mental edge necessary to flourish in the NFL. 

 

Round 4-7 BOOM

 

Troy Smith:  Forget the NC Title Game.  Smith had no time to do anything against UF.  Before that he had pin-point accuracy and won several big games while showing great leadership.  He is as tall as Drew Brees and surrounded by numerous veteran mentors including the QB.  Smith is entering an ideal situation and I am betting he eventually replaces McNair as the starter. 

 

4-7 BUST

 

Isaiah Stanback:  This is more desperate than when the Cowboys used their 2nd rounder on an inconsistent and drug-infested Quincy Carter years ago.  Perhaps not more desperate, but desperate nonetheless.  I cannot even visualize Stanback throwing an NFL pass.  Take an O-lineman or safety.  Why throw away a 4th rounder on a kid with zero chance in the NFL. 

 

APRIL 22, 2007

 

QUESTION - Dayne Crist has been anointed as the best prep QB in California.  Last week he verbally committed to play at Notre Dame.  The same Notre Dame team that currently has four QBs, most of whom are young, vying for the starting QB job this year.  One of which happens to be the "best high school QB since John Elway".  He is super-recruit Jimmy Clausen.  As a side note, Jimmy Clausen has four years of eligibility remaining. 

 

The question has three parts...

 

1.  What is Dayne Crist thinking?

2.  What are your thoughts regarding his decision?

3.  Where will Dayne Crist be in three years?

 

 

S

 

1) first he's thinking that an oral commitment is non-binding. second he's thinking charlie weis will guarantee his nfl career. third he's thinking that, at best, he'll beat out clausen and, at worst, he'll get 2 years as starting qb of notre dame when clausen leaves after his junior year.

 

2) an oral commitment is hardly even a decision any more - so i don't think much about it. if he sticks with nd, then history will prove it as either smart or dumb; the quality of the decision won't be apparent until he's already succeeded or already failed. same is true if he switches the commitment.

 

3) in 3 years he'll sitting out during a transfer year. he'll leave nd after losing the backup job to some other 5-star kid and enroll at san diego st.

 

 

I

 

1.  I am fairly confident Dayne Crist got caught up in the moment without fully thinking this decision through.  Jabba rolled into their home with his Super Bowl rings, fancy football terminology, and NFL memories and promises.  Roll that in with an academically elite university with huge national attention and the match was made.  It all sounded too appealing for the Crist family and they prematurely jumped at the opportunity.

 

2.  I think Crist is a fool.  He is either a fool or does not harbor any immediate goals of football success.  It's not like it's some solid recruit just ahead of him.  It is hyper-recruit Jimmy Clausen that is going to be given numerous chances to succeed for at least the next three years.  I respect the macho-ism of "may the best man win" and feeling you are so talented you can beat out anyone, even the already legendary Jimmy Clausen.  But there is only one QB who starts and eventually the voice of reason must kick in.  My only potential rationale is that the family are life-long ND fans and devout Catholics.  But I doubt it.     

 

3.  My guess is Crist never enrolls at Notre Dame.  ND will stumble out of the gates and be staring at the Gator Bowl as a best case scenario before October.  Weis will deflect the grumblings and over-zealous media by giving Clausen the job.  The media will love it, Clausen will lead them to wins over Navy and Stanford, and then will say something like "wanting to win multiple NC's at Notre Dame".  The writing will be on the wall and Crist will eventually de-commit and go AZST or Oregon

 

APRIL 15, 2007

 

QUESTION - name 3 "what-ifs" that would have significantly changed the college football landscape over the past 10 years.

 

 

S

 

1) what if notre dame hadn't hired davie, 1997 - except for the faust years, notre dame had steadily been a top 10 program. holtz had helped re-establish the irish by winning a national title and making notre dame a very desirable head coaching job. all the irish had to do was dial the phone of a successful head coach and open the checkbook. instead the irish brass went for the hot, cheap assistant coach (davie). in the 10 years since that decision the irish have had 4 coaches and only 1 top-10 finish. notre dame is now an afterthought in top-10 conversations.

 

2) what if osu hadn't gotten the pass interference call vs miami, 2001 - for a brief moment the canes had stopped the buckeyes on 4th and goal in overtime and had clinched their 2nd consecutive national title (and continued a 34-game winning streak). then, seemingly out of nowhere,  a yellow flag lands in the end-zone signaling pass interference. the phantom call gave osu a 1st-and-goal which  promptly became a td-lead and a win. the victory brought osu their first national title in 35 years, returned osu to national consciousness, immediately established tressel as a top 5 coach, and permanently crippled coker and the canes (and mcgahee).

 

3) what if vince young hadn't signed with texas, 2002-2005 - before young arrived in austin mack brown and the horns were known for 2 things: big losses to ou and holiday bowl shoot-outs. texas fans were still dreaming of darrell royal and the 1960's and wondering why a vast recruiting territory, big money, and an endless fan-base weren't enough to build a dominate football program. but one signature changed everything. young brought the horns their first title in decades and stopped usc from an unprecedented 3rd consecutive national title.

 

 

I

 

1.  What if Ohio State had shown up in the 2001 Outback Bowl?  The loss to South Carolina surprisingly ended the tenure of John Cooper.  It was considered a proactive move and an OSU win could have easily bought Cooper another season.  Who knows what would have happened had the Bucks won?  UM would have participated in another BCS bowl (likely) and this present OSU juggernaut might have taken a completely different path.

 

2.  What if Texas had not lost 65-13 to OU in 2003?  Then super-recruit Adrian Peterson was mulling over offers between OU, TX, and USC.  The TX native later confessed this game was pivotal in his decision as he famously stated, "I went to OU because I want to play for a NC."  Had Texas won, or at least been competitive, they might have pulled in their prized instate recruit.  Imagine Peterson and Young in the same backfield?  They likely beat OU the following season and could have won back-to-back NC's.  Mack Brown and the TX-OU series would be viewed entirely differently.

 

3.  What if Mike Richardson had turned around a half second quicker?  Remember the 4th and 8 pass to Jarrett at ND two years ago?  The game is defined by the "Bush Push", however Richardson had solid coverage on Jarret on that pivotal play in the waning seconds.  A Richardson deflection, and ND win, might have pushed USC out of the title game.  Instead of listening to Mark May ramble on the entire month of December about how USC is the greatest ever, the Trojans would have one NC under Carroll and a controversial one at that.  Instead of a dynasty they'd be recalled as chokers perhaps. 

 

 

APRIL 8, 2007

 

QUESTION - give me your early favorites for 2007 big ten offensive ploy, defensive ploy, and coach of the year.

 

 

S

 

offensive poy = pj hill, wisconsin - in the tradition of great badger rbs, hill will rush for 1500 yards+ behind a veteran o-line and be the primary offensive weapon on a top-10 team. the wrs are good enough to keep the opponents lbs honest and the defense is good enough to keep the badger offense on the field.

 

defensive poy = dan connor, penn st - connor should feel the void left by posluszny and be the stats leader on a solid defense. 100+ tackles and a handful of sacks gives him the edge over laurinaitis in a year when few big name big ten defensive players will get preseason publicity.

 

coach of the year = joe paterno - the defense should be serviceable, if not strong, and the offense should be borderline explosive. morelli matured at qb toward the end of '06 and derrick williams is ready to achieve his freshman hype. if a reliable, durable rb emerges this could be the best nittany lion offense since larry johnson in 2000. the schedule is tough, but notre dame, wisconsin, and ohio st are all at home and the michigan game is early. the result will be another 10-win year for paterno, a january bowl, and a top-15 finish.

 

I

 

Offensive POY:  Chad Henne.  There are not a ton of options of this award.  Mike Hart, while a UM fan favorite and workhorse in the backfield, lacks the big play ability and dazzling runs to generate the respect he deserves.  PJ Hill will run over weak defenses yet get stifled against faster more talented front sevens.  Henne has all the tools.  A veteran O-line with an AA at left tackle.  A plethora of playmakers at WR along with the ultimate safety valve in Mike Hart.  If OC Terry Malone allows Henne could be a legitimate Heisman candidate with 30 TD's on a high profile offense. 

 

Defensive POY:  James Laurinaitis: My guess is that OSU will overachieve, especially on defense, and hover around the top 10 all year.  Laurinaitis already has the needed publicity from his WWF wrestling father and should anchor and captain another solid defensive unit in C-bus.  Teammate Malcomn Jenkins and PSU LB Dan Connor will push for the honor.

 

Coach of the Year:  Kirk Ferentz:  Beliema will have expectations this season.  Tressel will not garner serious consideration unless the stars align properly in C-bus and anything short of a one loss season will eliminate Carr.  Enter a blast from the past; Kirk Ferentz.  The loss of Drew Tate may actually be a blessing.  The Hawkeyes return talent at their skill positions on offense (outside of QB), and their largest weakness will be at o-line which happens to be KF's trademark.  Also, as a mere side-note, the Hawkeyes avoid UM and OSU.  Ferentz will reclaim the momentum he had previously built and don't be shocked if Iowa ends up in either a BCS game or the Cap One Bowl.  Both would grossly exceed present expectations in the national media.  

 

APRIL 1, 2007

 

QUESTION - You are in a NHL SEGA 94 tournament against your three primary competitors.  For you it is Inman, Hance, and Vasher.  For me it is Scofield, Hance, and Vasher. 

 

Using the history of CFB as your guide, assign each member to a CFB program that most resmembles their game, your opinion of their 94' tradition, current respect of their game, etc. 

 

For example, Giamio would be (as an example) Florida State because he was all flash and hot air with inconsistent play. 

 

 

S

 

these comparisons are limited to the last 15 years of a football program - the length of time we've been playing hock.

 

inman = virginia tech - underrated, wins more than you think, rarely wins big but rarely loses big, a few moments of true greatness mixed with 15 years of overachieving. play varies in big games. probably too conservative to ever make a significant leap up the charts but too well-coached to ever fall either.

 

hance = notre dame - no defense, potentially lethal offense, usually overmatches average players and is overmatched by good players. a tendency to keep games close but rarely pulls the big upset and occasionally gets run off the ice in a beatdown. still has some name value, but was better 15 years ago.

 

vasher = wisconsin - tough inside the blue line, not flashy, workmanlike, and has honed a small set of dependable scoring moves. wasn't really on the map 15 years ago. has probably plateau-ed in the upper tier as an above-average player who can beat anyone on a given night but doesn't always play big in big games.

 

 

I

 

Vasher:  LSU.  Not in the elite company of his common opponenst, but has improved greatly the last 10 years.  Has the ability to make real big noise in the sport and is respected by everyone he plays.  Traditonally a baseball school (Sports Talk) and plays better at home (his basement).  Expectations are higher than what reality would show. 

 

Scofield:  Michigan.  Consistently good and plays with discipline and class.  The competition has leveled the field a bit, but can always use tradition and past success as a crutch when things go bad.  A legendary figure within the game who has maintained his play to a level few have maintained.  Current success, while good, does not match the goals and aspirations the program feels it deserves.

 

Hance:  UCLA.  A basketball school (Coach K) that has been routinely whipped and embarassed by instate rivals.  Only when the stars are aligned properly do they win a meaningful game.  When things go bad they fold up the tent quickly and are prone to blowout losses.  A flashy offense that is predictable. 

 

MARCH 25, 2007

 

QUESTION - which of the major bcs program is probably cheating.

 

 

S

 

Tennessee

 

the vols have a fat, personality-less coach, limited tradition, terrible orange uniforms, and the worst recruiting base in southeast. so, how they consistently sign bluechip kids from across the country is a complete mystery. the most likely explanation is that they cheat. and bad. bags of cash, free cars and houses, sex with coeds, you name it. dominant d-tackles, notoriously the toughest (and dumbest) kids to recruit, regularly sign with tenn. it doesn't seem to matter that they come from miami, hawaii, colorado, and other faraway (more desirable) places. running backs, receivers, and qbs too.

 

the cheating is so obvious it hurts. the real question is how are they doing it.

 

I

 

USC

 

Ok, I know they are USC.  The same USC in sunny California with the nice uniforms and hot co-eds.  Yet there are several colleges with similar criteria and they don't pull blue-chip talent from every corner of the country like USC.  The Trojans have ample talent in their own backyard yet insist on raiding the cupboards from across the nation.  When USC talks people listen,  perhaps a bit too much.  Fred Davis, Dwayne Jarret, Mike Williams, Ronald Johnson, etc.  Florida and Texas rely almost soley on home-grown talent.  USC could do the same. 

 

Plus, how does this Reggie Bush deal, that has conveniently been shoved under the rug, scream anything but cheating?  Add into the mix the quiet shiftiness of Pete Carrol and the abundance of cash and celebrity influence surrounding LA and USC must cheat.  They might do a nice job of cheating, but they cheat. 

 

MARCH 18, 2007

 

QUESTION - Give me your early favorites for SEC offensive PLOY, Defensive PLOY, and Coach of the Year.

 

 

S

 

offensive poy = darren mcfadden, arkansas - the 2006 heisman runner-up has to be the early favorite. he's by the far the best player in the sec (in a year when the sec will be looking for new stars), he does everything, and he plays in a run-first offense behind a massive o-line. if mcfadden stumbles, fellow hog teammate felix jones, tenn qb eric ainge, flor qb tim tebow, and aub qb brandon cox are early names to watch.

 

defensive poy = quentin groves, auburn - a speedy, playmaking d-end like groves should thrive in a defense that includes a veteran secondary and an experienced interior line. groves will be the most-recognized name on a defense that will likely rank in the top 10 most of the year. other than groves, lsu stars glenn dorsey and ali highsmith are names to watch.

 

coach of the year = steve spurrier, s carolina - coach of the year's usually exceed expectations. in the sec east, the gamecocks expectations are always 4th (behind flor, uga, and tenn). but spurrier has already shown that he can compete on the sideline with the big 3 and he's starting to get the players to compete on the field. with florida depleted defense and georgia's youth, it'll be between the cocks and vols for an sec east title. that'll keep spurrier's name afloat all season. other names to watch include rick brooks, houston nutt, and tommy tuberville.

 

 

I

 

Offensive POY:  Andre Woodson, UK.  This may be a bit of stretch, but an experience SR QB is a precious commodity in CFB.  Woodson could easily lead UK to 7-8 wins and a respectable bowl game.  Given the youth at QB in the SEC it is possible he could be 1st team all SEC.  The voters finally throw the poor Cats' a bone. 

 

Defensive POY:  Ali Highsmith, LSU.  LSU is assembling arguably the most consistent and respected defense in the SEC.  Highsmith will be a force at LB and the signature player on a squad, that while rebuilding the secondary, should once again establish themselves among the nations best.

 

Coach of the Year:  Mark Richt, UGA.  After back-to-back years of losing massive amounts of talent the Dawgs will return a deep squad next year.  Given last year's respectable 9 win season, minus several key parts, the Dawgs could quietly sneak into the mix in the SEC East.  Overcoming a FLA, LSU, and an emerging SC team would garner loads of attention.  Given Richt's track record that scenario is no stretch.

MARCH 11, 2007

 

QUESTION - in honor of march madness, name the 6 best football programs at traditional basketball schools.

 

 

S

 

1) louisville - 3 top-20 finishes and 32 wins in the last 3 years, not bad for a school with 2 nc's in the 80's and rick pitino as its current head basketball coach.

 

2) utah - 37 wins in 4 years including a bcs bowl victory and an undefeated season.

 

3) gtech - 10 consecutive bowl games and a former nfl head coach.

 

4) ucla - 17 wins over the last 2 seasons including a win over USC.

 

5) maryland - 4 9-win seasons in 6 years and an acc title.

 

6) arkansas - 10-win season in 2006 and sec title game appearance.

 

 

I

 

This is tough because I am having trouble deciding if some schools are football or basketball schools and coming up with programs outside of yours is difficult....

 

1.  Louisville:  A true legendary basketball program with a blossoming football program.  Both the heritage of a hoops program and high level football success.

 

2.  UCLA:  Bonus points for being arguably the most acclaimed hoops program ever.  Additional points for numerous Rose Bowls and a name second only to USC in the PAC 10 for football.

 

3.  Arkansas:  Despite a dip in hoops lately, the Hogs are still entrenched as the second most noteworthy hoops program in conference.  Add to that the consistency of a football program that is an annual postseason participant.

 

4.  Wisconsin:  I would bet they'd prefer to be a football school.  However, the success of Bo Ryan has eclipsed that of Alvarez and Beilema at a school that lacks a clear cut identity. 

 

5.  UConn:  Maybe a bit of a stretch, but this football program has achieved a ton at such a young D1 age. 

 

6.  Maryland:  The Fridge has brought glimpses of hope and stability to a school that itches to join the ranks of Duke and UNC in hoops.

 

MARCH 4, 2007

 

QUESTION - You are given a one year sabbatical from your job.  Your task is to write a 300 page CFB book on any program, season, player, coach, event, game, etc.  In short, as long as it relates to CFB it is fair game.  The topic can be past or present.  You are given unlimited access to games, coaches, AD's, boosters, fans, etc.

 

What is your book about?

 

 

S

 

the book would be about recruiting. but, it would not tell the stories of recruiting that fans already know - the ones that focus on 40-times, recruiting rankings, and the poor inner-city kids who overcome tremendous odds. no, instead the book would tell the real, untold (and often unknown) stories of recruiting - the ones with 25 text messages a day, 100's of hand written letters, dozens of scholarship offers, in-house visits, shameless middle-aged men, excessive gifts/trips, strip bars, all-night parties, back-room deals, bags of cash, cover-ups, endless lies, and cheating, cheating, and more cheating.

 

the book would report on what fans want (and need) to know: recruiting, seedy and raw.

 

the book would follow 2 big-time recruits through the complete recruiting process culminating with signing day announcements. along the way it would also profile the coaches and programs who were doing the recruiting. the main stories of these 2 recruits, their backgrounds, and personalities would be infused with 2 other storylines. the first storyline would focus on the histories of the coach and programs: 1) the coach's past indiscretions, interviews with former assistants, past recruits, opposing coach's, etc., 2) major boosters, their business dealings, relationships with former coaches/players, interviews with former business partners, etc., and 3) the programs past record with the ncaa, past coaches, disassociated boosters, interviews with former players, transfers, opposing ad's, etc. the second storyline would focus on the recruiting process itself: 1) what usually happens with big-time recruits, 2) uncensored interviews with the recruits themselves, 3) what are they being offered, 4) who's doing the offering, and 5) how are the offering influencing their decisions.

 

the goal of the book would be to blow the cover off recruiting - to give fans a window into the recruiting process as it actually unfolds with all the sensational (and scandalous) details.

 

 

I

 

My book is going to focus around one theme:  A coach on the hot seat.

 

For one season I want to follow around a university and its football program whose coach is in a truly make-or-break season.  The interviews/access I want to largely include in my book...

 

1.  The boosters.  What impact do the high-end boosters really have in the fate of a coach?

 

2.  Go behind the scenes with the AD and university president.  Are they making demands?  Are they formulating a "short list."  How concerned are they over the financial obligation to the current coach?

 

3.  The HC and his assistants.  Is the HC losing his cool in meetings.  Does he feel the pressure? How does he cope with the stress and uncertainty.  Does there come a point when his assistants start making calls to other coaches preparing to lose their job?  Will the HC feel relieved when this is over? 

 

4.    The spouses and their children.  How does the wife deal with the stress?  Are they talking to realtors?  Does the wife drink more?  How aware are the kids of the cut-throat environment their father lives in?

 

I want unlimited access to the office of the AD.  The living room of the coaches house on Saturday night after a tough loss.  I want to listen to phone calls made by boosters.  I want to be their when "for sale" signs go up in their yard.    I want to get inside their sole and reveal the true devastation and widespread impact when a coach gets fired. 

 

FEBRUARY 25, 2007

 

QUESTION - what will the top 10 storylines be heading into the 2007 college football season?

 

 

S

 

1. florida vs usc - these 2 programs will dominate the headlines approaching september. both teams have loads of talent returning, top recruiting classes entering, big-name qbs starting, and recent national title coaches coaching. 25% of pundits will declare a florida/usc bcs title game before classes are even in session. of course, it won't happen.

 

2. power of the sec - florida and lsu will be in the national title conversation all year. georgia, tennessee, auburn, and arkansas will begin the year as top 20 teams. saban and spurrier will steal headlines. the sec could actually be stronger this year than it was last year and every week there will be a match-up of highly ranked teams.

 

3. state of the b10 - january is rarely kind to the b10 and 2007 was no different. the 2 conference bell-cows michigan and ohio state were shamed by visibly superior teams and recruiting was sub-par. that alone will raise questions about the conference's state, but then delaney followed brilliantly with the most ill-advised commissioner decision since tranghese publicly wept for miami to remain in the big east.

 

4. nick saban - this is a major, major story. bama was a cfb powerhouse? check. bama was unhappy with its current place in the cfb world? bama went after a national-title-caliber coach? check. bama paid said coach $4 million/year to leave the nfl? check. bama football just became relevant again? check.

 

5. this year's boise st - this is already on the lips and minds of various media types who debate which small-time program will crash the big-time bcs party. tcu, byu, and yes even boise st could be the next boise st. each has already been mentioned as a possible candidate and it's likely that others will emerge over the first few months of the season.

 

6. new acc and big east coaches - big-name programs and big-name coaches were on the move this off-season and nowhere was that more apparent than the acc and big east. but davis to unc, shannon to miami, and obrien to ncst, will make for outstanding press leading into fall practice in acc country. and kragthorpe at louisville and kelley at cinci should be a rude addition for coach rod at wvu (who is replacing 1/2 his staff).

 

7. louisville or wvu - one of these teams will be someone's sleeper national title team and the discussion will gain momentum over the first 2 months of the season. will it be louisville with heisman candidate brohm and former tulsa coach kragthorpe? or, will it be wvu heisman hopefuls white and slaton and former alabama coach rodriguez?

 

8. notre dame sucks - it feels good to say it and mean it. the irish will likely be good soon, but for this 1 year the roster will be full of experienced players with no talent and talented players with no experience. the leader of the latter group will be yo-boy jimmy clausen who will be the first freshman in history to hold all pre- and post-game news conferences at the cfb hall of fame.

 

9. miami or fsu - after way-down years in 2006 both former football factories made significant changes to their coaching staffs. the 'canes hired randy shannon who later hired patrick nix as oc. translation: the team will more like old miami than new miami. the 'noles hired jimbo fisher as oc and added chuck 'red shoes' amato and rick tricket from wvu. translation: the team will more like old fsu than new fsu. this may finally be the year the acc gets its marquee title game match-up.

 

10. no heisman front-runners - mcfadden, slaton, brohm, mccoy, and booty will be many people's preseason top five. but each has a weakness that could cripple them early. mcfadden has no passing game, slaton shares the yards with white, brohm lost petrino, mccoy is a sophmore, and booty is no leinart. unlike recent years, the eventual heisman winner may not come from the preseason top five list.

 

 

I

 

10.  Sam Keller.  A proven transfer potentially taking over the reigns at one of CFB's beloved programs.  This QB battle will generate loads of attention early and will gain momentum if Keller gets the nod.

 

9.  West Virginia.  A departed coach and RB at Louisville.  Plus, a hesitant embracing of Rutgers will put the pressure solely on Coach Rod and his talented backfield.  The national media will expect more, much more, from the Mountaineers this go around.  Time to put up or shut up.

 

8.  The circus in Fayetteville.  A Heisman front-runner.  An embattled coach coming off an SEC runner-up finish.  A looming high profile transfer.  Too many storylines for the Hogs to go unnoticed this year.  A near certain bet that the controversy in Arkansas takes a new dimension this season.

 

7.  The ACC.  Fresh off a terrible season, the ACC has too many quality programs for a repeat of last year's dismal performance.  With a lineup that could warrant the 2nd best league in CFB this conference will be out to prove last year was a fluke.

 

6.  Jimmy Clausen.  If a depleted ND squad fails, as many expect, the clamoring for hyper-recruit Jimmy Clausen will grow by the week.  Expect an eventual start for the true freshman and a media blitz to follow. 

 

5.  Tim TebowFlorida will rightfully gain many of the headlines entering this season.  The key figure for the defending champs will be over-hyped and still unproven sophomore QB Tim Tebow.  A lot will be expected of the budding star and the expectations will likely outgrow the realities when he is asked to throw vertical passes and play 60 minutes a game. 

 

4.  Nick Saban and the new hires.  Saban is the headliner.  He has, warranted or not, created very lofty expectations in T-town.  Immediately.  The return of Dennis Erickson will draw attention to Tempe.  The stoic Randy Shannon will be a noticeable figure in South Beach.  Kragthopre in Petrino's shoes, Chizik in Ames, and the over-paid Butch Davis in UNC will all generate attention.  However, Saban will be the most engaging and scrutinized of the group.

 

3.  Wisconsin.  The Badgers will be trendy B10 pick this season as the veteran-laden team replaces the damaged goods in A2 and C-bus atop the preseason polls.

 

2.  The SEC.  While the SEC always creates love for the best conference, this season could mark the largest gap between them and the rest of the CFB world.  They will be the run-away selection as the best conference in CFB with whoever is 2nd a distant 2nd.  Bowl season will dictate their true spot.

 

1.  The psyche of Ohio State.  The shine has, at least temporarily, worn of the big game Buckeyes.  Fresh off a pasting in the Fiesta Bowl and the loss of a plethora of key NFL talent the Bucks will be viewed with a skeptical eye early in the 07' campaign.  Oklahoma was the last team to encounter an embarrassing NC loss and their rebound is still in progress.  Will we see a different, and less macho, OSU demeanor in 07'?

 

FEBRUARY 18, 2007

 

QUESTION - Of all the current SEC coaches, minus Steve Spurrier, which coach is most likely to someday be regarded as the greatest coach in that program's history?

 

 

S

 

some programs don't have room for another 'greatest coach'. for alabama, it will always be bryant. for tennessee, neyland. some coaches won't never get the credit (like lsu's les miles) and others just aren't good enough (like houston nutt, sly croom, ed orgeron, and rich brooks). the 3 most likely candidates and mark richt, tommy tuberville, and urban meyer. meyer has a significant obstacle in spurrier. not only did spurrier win a national title but he also accumulated 6 sec titles a heisman trophy, and put florida football on the map. and, though richt has a good chance to pass vince dooley's on-field success, dooley's advantage comes in decades of service to georgia as athletic director and establishing the georgia football program on a national stage.

 

consequently, tommy tuberville has the best chance of becoming the greatest coach at his program - auburn. no auburn coach has had nationally significant success. the 2 closest and shug jordan and pat dye, jordan is the most revered coach in auburn history and dye is the winningest. but tuberville could easily pass both with his current run of success and by delivering auburn an elusive, recognized national title. tuberville runs a clean program (unlike dye), beats alabama (unlike jordan), produces good players, hires good assistants, and wins close games with good coaching. in 5 years tuberville will be mentioned seriously in the conversation as the greatest auburn coach.

 

 

I

 

Urban Meyer.

 

Of the potential cadidates, Meyer, Tuberville, Richt, and Miles, Coach Meyer has the toughest coach to climb.  Steve Spurrier will always be a key historical link to Gator Football.  He started their success and, despite a bried hiccup with Ron Zook, should be credited for laying the foundation that Meyer has built upon. 

 

However, there are a few reasons why Meyer will one day overcome Spurrier and become the most noteworthy UF coach of all-time:

 

1.  He is young.  Meyer could easily have 25 more years of coaching left in the tank.

 

2.  He is not likely to take his show to the NFL.  While this is tough to gauge at such a premature time, as of now Meyer's system would not translate well to the NFL. 

 

3.  He is at a desirable CFB campus.  There are few opportunities for Meyer to get a better CFB gig.  Tuberville, Miles, and to a lesser degree Richt are more likely to be wooed by a bigger CFB name.

 

4.  He already has a national title.   If Meyer can string together a couple more NC's in next decade, which appears certainly plausible, he'll have only the "name" of Steve Spurrier to eclipse. 

 

5.  Which brings me to my next point.  Spurrier will always be adored in Gainesville.  However, that long-standing admiration is likely to take some slack the longer he stays in South Carolina and faces off against Meyer and the Gators every year.  Imagine Woody Hayes ending his career at Purdue or Schembchler having a cup of tea with Wisconsin before retiring.  Their legendary status would have remained, but some of the glamour would have worn off.

 

6.  Meyer has charisma.  He gained much attention this year when he spouted off against a looming UM-OSU NC game.  He created controversy and in the process revealed a demeanor that some liked and some hated.  That type of behavior gets you talked about which creates more attention and visibility.  Woody Hayes  enhanced his image with years of "look-at-me" behavior.  Meyer is in the early stages of becoming a very high-profile CFB coach. 

 

FEBRUARY 11, 2007

 

QUESTION - if you could use your 'way-back' machine to travel backwards in time to 3 saturdays and watch any player or game in college football history, where would you go?

 

 

S

 

1) texas vs usc, 2006 - the storylines for this game were unmatched: 3 heisman-worthy winners on one field in leinart, bush, and young; a 34 game winning streak and a 3rd consecutive national title in the balance; the rose bowl. and yet, those things turned out to be secondary to what unfolded on the field. the game itself surpassed every storyline.

 

2) alabama vs penn st, 1979 - 4 consecutive goal-line stands from inside the 5-yard line awarded bear bryant his 6th (and last) national title and left joe paterno waiting for his first. rarely are 2 coaching legends on the same field with so much on the line.

 

3) barry sanders vs oklahoma, 1988 - arguably the greatest, most dynamic running back in cfb history playing in a fierce in-state rivalry game (known as bedlam). though the sooners were ultimately victorious, sanders amassed 215 rushing yards against a swarming sooner d and kept the pokes close before eventually falling 31-28.

 

 

I

 

I would not go simply to see a player.  I would go to see a historical game or a game I that I find particularly intriguing.  The choices.....

 

1.  1969 Michigan-OSU:  The most important game in the history of UM football.  Convincingly knocking off the undefeated arch-rival juggernaut in Bo's first year would easily be the most numbing experience of my life. 

 

2.  1996 Michigan-OSU:  This actually might have been a bit uncomfortable.  I might have sprinted for the exits to get home.  However, watching OSU fans sit stunned (two years in a row) in their home stadium as another NC appearance went down the toilet would have been oh-so-pleasing. 

 

3.  1984 BC-Miami:  A great high scoring game with the 2nd most famed ending in CFB. I am tempted to pick an old-school game just to see the atmosphere.  However, after I soaked it in I'd probably get a little bored with the game.  These picks may be boring, but they are truthful.

 

FEBRUARY 4, 2007

 

QUESTION - Pick a historical game from pre-1980.  A game that was once billed as "titanic" and "immeasurably important" yet may be largely unnoticed by today's younger CFB fans. 

 

When you've picked the game then provide a brief recap of the game. 

 

 

S

 

arkansas vs texas, 1969 - the hogs vs horns game doesn't mean much anymore. the 2 teams are in different conferences, rarely play, and own very different statuses in the modern college football world. but at one time this game meant something and, in 1969, it meant everything.

 

hyped as one of only a few 'games of the century' (also called 'dixie's last stand' as it was the last major sporting event that matched 2 all-white teams), this memorable game featured the #1 and #2 ranked teams in the country playing on the last weekend of the season. both were undefeated; texas was #1 and riding an 18 game winning streak. arkansas was #2 and on a 15 game streak of its own.

 

the intensity of the rivalry had long since been established; arkansas was the only non-texas school in the swc and regularly stole top high school recruits from the state of texas. but the intensity reached a fever pitch under legendary coaches (and nemeses) frank broyles of arkansas and darrell royal of texas.

 

the pregame hype was unprecedented. the original october date was actually changed to december to maximize the game's publicity. when michigan beat #1 ohio st in november and texas and arkansas breezed through their remaining games the stage was set. both teams were undefeated and, to the dismay of penn st and notre dame, president richard nixon declared that the winner would be crowned national champ.

 

when kickoff arrived it as clear that the hype had not gone unnoticed. 50% of all televisions tuned into the game, billy graham delivered the pre-game address/prayer, and nixon himself arrived in fayetteville just after kickoff on a helicopter that landed next to the stadium on a practice field. other future presidents played a role as well: george bush sr was also in attendance and bill clinton, and arkansas native, listened on the radio.

 

the game itself matched the hype. arkansas led 14-0 into the 4th quarter; the result of 2 long first-half scoring drives orchestrated by razorback qb, and texas native, bill montgomery. but early in the 4th quarter texas qb james street cut the lead to 14-8 with a 42 yard td run and a daring 2-pt conversion. minutes later, and facing 4th and 3, street hit his tight end for a 40 yard gain setting up the go ahead touchdown run with under 4 minutes remaining. texas led 15-14.

 

arkansas drove from its own 20 yard line to the texas 39 with just over a minute left on the strength of montgomery's arm trying to move in range for last-second field goal attempt. on 2nd and 3, and driving into a stiff wind, montgomery rolled right and delivered a pass into the arms of a texas defensive back. texas promptly ran out the clock and escaped with a 1 point victory and the national title - as declared with a plaque by nixon himself.

 

texas would later solidify their claim to #1 by beating notre dame in the cotton bowl. penn st, who also finished undefeated, declined an invitation to meet texas in the cotton bowl and has argued ever since that they were the better team.

 

this game rarely gets discussed anymore. in part because the swc dissolved a decade ago and with it the arkansas/texas rivalry. but it should, it was the pinnacle for a conference that would later ride this game, and its bad-boy reputation, into historical annals of college football.

 

 

I

 

Nebraska/OU, 1971 - Thanksgiving Day.  Two intense and hated border rivals.  Both undefeated.  A Heisman trophy winner.  A legendary coach.  A fantastic ending.  1 versus 2.  The ultimate billing, "The Game of the Century."  What else do you want?

 

After trading possessions early, OU punted to the electrifying, and soon to he Heisman winner, Johnny Rogers.  Rogers averted a couple of tackles and took the punt 72 yards to the house.  7-0 Nebraka before a stunned scarlet and white crown in Norman.  OU countered with a methodical 72 yard drive that ended with a FG.  The Sooners had relaxed from the ensuing Rogers punt return to settle the crowd. 

 

That was merely the beginning of a riveting and fist-clenching affair that would go back and forth all afternoon. 

 

Half way into the 4Q OU moved in front 31-28 on Jack Mildren's TD pass with under two minutes remaining.  The Sooners had overcome a 3rd quarter 11 point deficit and a couple of 4th down conversions.  The invincible Nebraska juggernaut was on the ropes with 7:10 remaining in the game. 

 

Yet after a methodical and time-consuming drive Nebraksa has answered the bell once again.  A short plunge had put them up 35-31 with 1:38 left in the game.  The Sooners failed to convert a single first down in their last, desperate drive.  A deflected pass into the Nebraska sideline on 4th down signaled the end to a great game. 

 

After a pit stop in Hawaii, Nebraska went on to throttle Alabama by over 30 in the Orange Bowl to claim the NC.  A dejected Sooners squad traveled south to the Sugar Bowl and easily dismissed Auburn.  Not only did both teams embark on a forever memorable afternoon, but they solidified the true importance of their contest by showing the country they were the two best teams. 

 

JANUARY 28, 2007

 

QUESTION - which top 20 cfb program would crumble if it lost its current coach? which top 20 cfb program would improve dramatically if it lost it's current coach?

 

 

S

 

get worse:

 

frank beamer - there's little question that beamer is exactly responsible for vtech's status in cfb. he's the reason that vtech was invited to join the acc 2 years ago; he's the reason one of the most popular players in the nfl, michael vick, became a hokie; he's the reason vtech played fsu for the national title in 1999; and he's the reason vtech has 6 10-win seasons in the past 8 years and played in 14 consecutive bowls. he doesn't get 5-star recruits, he doesn't have a fertile recruiting ground, he doesn't have tradition to sell. without beamer none of this would have happened and, with any other coach, vtech would be an afterthought.

 

get better

 

bobby bowden - this is so obvious that it's almost unfair. fsu is a potential giant in cfb, as was clear for the entire decade of the 90's. head coaches reach legendary status, asst coaches get good head jobs, recruits love the noles attitude (and recruits are everywhere), it has a national reputation, and the acc is easily the most winnable bcs conference (wake forest and gtech played for the title last year). to his credit, bowden has had not trouble landing stellar recruiting classes and winning acc titles. but, fsu has only 1 10-win season in the last 6 years and hasn't finished in the top 10 since 2000. there are probably 2 dozen cfb coaches who could take the job tomorrow and earn a top-10 finish and 10 wins in 2007 - and as crazy as it sounds to say this about fsu, that would be a dramatic improvement.

 

 

I

 

Two names jumped out immediately once I read this question.  After further contemplation they have remained.

 

Mack Brown:  In all fairness, it is difficult for Texas to improve dramatically.  However, Mack Brown steers a ship with more built-in advantages than any program in the country.  For all these advantages his resume' is loaded with Holiday Bowls, Cotton Bowls, and for the most part underachieving.  It is no coincidence that his best season came when an unparalleled freak of nature was under center.  It is not unreasonable to think that in the post-VY era Texas will resort back to bi-annual BCS bowls with little NC contention.  They'll always have loads of talent, and therefore be good.  But the right coach could quickly take this program to the present level of USC or Ohio State.

 

Chris Peterson:  The results are in and it is official that Peterson was the true reason behind Dan Hawkins success.  Since his departure Colorado endured a miserable season and Peterson took BSU to new heights this past season.  Peterson, justified or not, is viewed as an innovative and progressive CFB mind who may not be long for Idaho.  He has been a staple of Boise's success even under Hawkins.  Without him this program will live a couple more seasons in the preseason top 25 then peter out and join the ranks of the myriad of other obscure mid-major western time zone teams.  

 

JANUARY 21, 2007

 

QUESTION - You are the same person you are today.  Same upbringing.  Experienced the south in your younger days and graduated high school in Michigan.  The one difference is that you are a five star tight end recruit out of Leslie and you are graduating in the class of 2007.  Everyone in the country has offered you a full-ride.  Everyone.  Your mother supports whatever decision you make and has promised to make most games regardless of travel.  You still have goals of becoming a professor, but at the same time there is some thought of playing the NFL someday. 

 

1.  What five schools get official visits and why.

2.  What school is the runner-up?

3.  What school gets your commitment?

 

 

S

 

experts initially have me linked to all the typical suspects: florida, lsu, nd, osu, usc, texas, etc. but i'm not a typical recruit. i'm searching for something special and in doing so i quickly eliminate many of the top programs, even going so far as to publicly announce my disinterest in nd and osu. i definitely want a winning program with a bright future, but i also want to matter and i want my signature to make a difference. after significant deliberation i schedule official visits to 5 schools. most share these characteristics: rabid fans and small college towns.

 

1) arkansas - the experts are surprised by this decision (but my family isn't). the experts view arkansas as an average sec team with almost no passing game and wonder how a 5-star tight end could even consider such a program. however, the experts don't know that i have a little hog blood in my veins leftover from my youth. the idea of going home is appealing to me but, truthfully, i am concerned about my football future under houston nutt.

 

2) clemson - the experts imagine that this is tommy bowden delivering a smooth recruiting pitch and don't realize that i have ties to south carolina and was at one time a casual tiger fan. i don't have clemson high on my list but i want them to want me.

 

3) virginia tech - this is my most objective visit. the hokies have a respectable history of developing tight ends, they have a hard-working and gritty reputation, and i respect frank beamer. the atmosphere is perfect and while i don't have any historic ties to the program or area, i feel like this is the safest choice.

 

4) alabama - bama has everything: small town, intense fans, tradition. i'm initially uncertain about new coach nick saban but quickly become convinced that he can produce nfl-quality players and that he'll at least be there as long as i will. the idea of bringing a cfb giant back to life excites me but i'm nervous about the current state of the program.

 

5) penn st - the tradition of psu and the legend of joe-pa pique my interest. this visit is part courtesy and part curiosity. i never seriously consider psu but really want to see it.

 

i also take an unofficial visit to michigan. it's certainly one of my top 5 and for obvious reasons (location, education, tradition). but i've seen the campus before and taking an unofficial here allows me to visit an additional school. it's a no-brainer. i'm comfortable with michigan and the staff but not overly excited.

 

i decide to narrow the list to 3 by mid-january after finishing the visits. the climate and sheer size of penn st make for an easy decision. i call joe-pa and politely tell him no thanks. the idea of clemson is compelling but the reality always comes up short. arkansas is my favorite visit but i can't trade my promising future to run-block for houston nutt. disappointed, i call both bowden and nutt.

 

in the days leading up to national sigining day i'm genuinely undecided between vtech, mich, and bama. all have the atmosphere i want but the challenge is finding the right fit. bama presents the most exciting choice, but there's definite risk and saban is an unknown. vtech presents the safest choice because i know i'll have a good, satisfying experience. michigan presents the most comfortable choice as there's almost no risk.

 

a few days before signing day i make the tough phone call to beamer and carr thanking them for their time and telling them that i'm headed to alabama. on signing day i quietly (and with little fan fare) fax my letter to saban.

 

 

I

 

Entering my recruitment I am consider a heavy UM lean.  Given my parents attended UM, and I've grown up a huge in-state fan, many experts are bored following my recruitment.  The end results seems so obvious.  Yet, to the surprise of many, I take my full allotment of visits and set a late date for my announcement.  If I am a UM gimme then they'll at least have to sweat it out.

 

1.  Michigan.  So obvious I won't bore you with the details.

 

2.  Colorado.  The atmosphere and environment are immediately intriguing.  I am also drawn to their past track record for producing NFL tight ends and realize that Hawkins will continue to implement a pass-happy attack.  I like the uniforms, respect the conference, and am quietly open to considering the option if I like the visit.

 

3.  Georgia.  The SEC has gotten my attention during this process.  I am definitely going to visit at least one SEC program and possibly two.  The Dawgs get an early visit.  Unsure if I'll really have the balls to do this (assuming I like the visit), I am very curious to get behind the scenes at UGA.  The intrigue of SEC football is something I must explore and expose myself to in order to fully evaluate this process.  Furthermore, I've heard great things about Athens and seem to initially like the idea of playing for Mark Richt.

 

4.  Georgia Tech.  While I am not thrilled about playing in the ACC, everything else about GT is appealing from afar.  The thought of living in ATL is very thought-provoking.  Plus, I'd get a top-level education with nice weather for a decent CFB program.  They'll need to blow my socks off to stay on the list however.

 

5.  Alabama.  After my UGA visit went well I filled my last spot with another SEC team.  Realizing there was not a school in the midwest (besides UM) that I was interested in the Tide enter as the dark-horse of the group.  I appreciate the level of interest the program receives from their fans and am drawn to the image of Alabama football. 

 

I finish all my visits by early December.  UM is still my leader, but I am at least thinking about other options.  Yet, I am overwhelmed by the media scrutiny and need to pare down my list prior to signing day.  By mid-December I have eliminated ..

 

Georgia Tech:  After visiting more quaint and appealing college towns I am no longer drawn to the big city.  Plus, the venues in the ACC are unimpressive and I realize I am playing for a basketball school.  Lastly, Chan Gailey was the least impressive of the coaches I have met.  With confidence I eliminate GT.

 

Alabama.  I liked Bama a lot and this is a tough call to Coach Saban.  However, I liked UGA more than Bama.  There is no point in stringing them along.  I am unsure how much Saban will use the TE and the town of Athens and proximity to ATL edge out T-town.

 

On signing day I commit to Michigan.  I knew all along this was the choice (yawn).  As the decision neared I became less interested in Colorado and more interested in Georgia.  The thought of going to Athens was more and more appealing and something I felt I could do successfully.   I had a tough time calling Coach Richt and will quietly be a Dawg fan for life.  However, I could never pass up the opportunity to join the "Michigan Family". 

 

JANUARY 14, 2007

 

QUESTION - name the current coach/program that is the most overrated and the current coach/program that is the most underrated.

 

 

S

 

underrated

 

tom o'brien, boston college - i understand that he is now the former bc coach. obrien took bc to a bowl game in the previous 8 years and has 7 consecutive bowl victories. for the last 7 years he's won at least 8 games. despite these consistent accomplishments, o'brien's teams rarely earned preseason top 25 votes and often went unmentioned in conference title conversations. he engineered an almost seamless transition to the acc and produced above-average teams with average recruits, average facilities, and average tradition. maybe even more impressive is that he did this in a city that doesn't care that much for college athletics and in a region that isn't known for producing great football talent.

 

overrated

 

bobby petrino, louisville - again, i understand that he is now the former louisville coach. petrino won 41 game in 4 years, a great accomplishment anywhere. but, a closer examination of the circumstance makes this accomplishment look more and more pedestrian. consider that petrino took over an already strong c-usa program from john l smith (a team that had won 27 games in 3 years). it wasn't as if petrino built louisville from nothing into a perenial power. he simply continued the momentum. also consider that 1/2 of petrino's victories at louisville came during c-usa membership and the transition to the big east occurred simultaneously with the departure of big east powers miami, vtech, and boston college. finally, consider that the centerpiece to petrino's last 2 seasons, brian brohm, chose louisville because his brother was the qb coach, it was not a recruiting coup. finally, the signature victory in his louisville career came over a miami team that was plainly on the decline and even bowl victories over wake forest and boise st aren't impressive.

 

 

I

 

Predicting a program/coach as overrated is a daunting task if one is to do it correctly.  To truly be underrated a coach must still be developing and their pinnacle in the future.  Frank Beamer was often regarded as underrated, however we have caught on.  Beamer is a good coach leading a respected and consistent program.  He has outgrown the "underrated" label.  At the same time legends like Bowden and Paterno, while having an impressive body of work, have largely been exposed in the media as past their prime.  They can no longer be labeled overrated since few believe they are good enough to garner legitimate respect.  Therefore, as I peer into my crystal ball I reveal an overrated and underrated program/coach.  However, I will only be proven correct when time allows these programs to reveal their true identities.

 

Overrated:

 

Tennessee and Phil Fulmer. 

 

Ask a Volunteer fan and they'll honestly believe they are an elite program.  In a name sense, they still might be.  However, following their NC title in 98 the Vols have been nothing more than an above average SEC team.  Bowl losses to Clemson, Maryland, Penn State, and K State have highlighted that their issues run deeper than simply playing in a tough league.  This past year, billed as a season to reclaim their reputation, ended with disappointment and another middle of the pack SEC season.  Solid, but hardly what the Orange Nation expects in Knoxville.  With the recent influx of coaching talent into the SEC look for this program to get exposed further as they'll continue to slide further away from an SEC title.  Instead of being an elite SEC team the Vols will soon be regarded as a fading SEC team.

 

Underrated 

Oregon State and Mike Riley

 

There is a lot to not like or not care about Oregon State.  They love JUCO talent.  They play fourth fiddle behind the power USC and the perennially underachieving Cal and Oregon programs.  They are hidden in a remote corner of the country that receives little attention. However, the Beavers are a steady group that annually hits the bowl circuit and has pulled off a few big wins over the last decade (ND, USC), held their own against their more publicized rival (Oreg.) and put a few playmakers in the NFL (CJ, Housh, D Anderson, S Jackson).  In short, OSU is a nice little program that nobody has given attention.  In time, we'll all quit hoping Oregon and AZST finally put it together for an entire season.  We'll realize that Cal and Tedford are simply not the combo we always thought.  We'll expose Dorrell and M. Stoops as nothing more than Jeckyl-Hyde types who are not miracle workers.  And, as we process this, we'll finally come to realize that this sleepy program in Corvallis just might have climbed to #2 in the PAC 10.